The False Intimacy of Twitter

by Dawn Lacallade

With a cross between the harsh economy and the surge of new networking tools, the web is a key component of the job hunt. People are using search engines (monster; yahoo, careerbuilder, etc.) as well as networking tools (linkedin, plaxio, twitter, facebook, etc.) With thesetools comes a whole new realm of social norms and rules that we are making up as we go. In the past two weeks, I have had two such interactions that solidified my understanding of one HUGE potential pitfall.

In the first instance the job seeker tweeted generically looking for someone from my company. I responded and we took it offline to a quick call. The applicant was interested in an open position and wanted to gauge the climate here before applying. I completely enjoyed the conversation and thought it might be a strong fit with the company, so I sent my thoughts over with the resume to the hiring VP. This applicant kept the entire exchange fairly formal and very relevant to the position at hand.

The Second person contacted me directly via linked in and asked if we could chat about a position. This person and I have been following each other on twitter within the Social Media Twitter Pack. In the back and forth conversation this applicant went so far to the informal that he actually ended up insulting me while giving me a hard time. In retrospect, I think he had a perceived intimacy because of the twitter relationship that (for me) did not directly translate to a personal relationship. Mye lesson learned was a strong reminder to maintain that professional stance even in these less formal vehicles when you are using them as a direct source of leads on positions.

Anyone else had an experience like this?

Verizon’s Online Community Forums

In a press release issued today, Verizon said that its new online community forums have proven to be a great place for customers to connect about service issues and even to reach the customer service department. According to the release, one of the growing base of super users is Justin McMurry of Keller, Texas, who describes his involvement as growing from a natural interest in Verizon’s FiOS TV and FiOS Internet services. Formerly a technical support expert for many years at a major technology company, McMurry said he enjoys solving problems and answering questions for others who visit the Community Forums in search of real-time feedback from fellow customers.

Are online forums a passing fad or here to stay?

Georgia lawmakers embrace social networking media

According to ajc.com, Savannah Republican, Sen. Eric Johnson now has as Twitter to update the public on Georgian affairs of the state.
Johnson has sent Twitter texts almost daily from the legislative session. On March 12, he tweeted from the Senate floor that his proposal to name tax-dodging lawmakers had come up again, and passed. ‘It allows for quick communication with a target audience,’ Johnson said in a telephone interview to ajc.com.
What do you think of politicians using social media to connect with their audience? Did Obama pave the way for this sort of communication?

The lies behind online ratings and reviews

Ratings and reviews lie. Simple, subtle lies, but lies all the same. And I suspect most people will never know.
‘Professional’ reviews
The first time I realized what a con ratings could be was when I visited Dubai. I was travelling with a group of friends and one of them booked the hotels. It was quite a surprise to hear we’d booked into a 5-star hotel for what seemed like a 3-star price. It transpired that this was not because my friend had negotiated a great deal, but because hotel stars in Dubai are dispersed as liberally as banking bonuses. Dubai is the land of the 7-star hotel and I’m afraid that has nothing to do with the Burj Al Arab being better than the 5-star Carlyle in New York or Cipriani in Venice.
Thankfully, one of the great things about online consumer-generated Ratings and Reviews is their ability to bypass the bias that could come from the reviewer benefiting from the review. At least that’s true so long as the reviews are honest and any bias is stated. If enough ‘ordinary’ people are writing the reviews then they ought to be trustworthy. And I am sure they are. However bias does still remain and so do a couple of other hidden lies of ratings and reviews.
The Growth of online ratings and reviews
First a little bit about the explosive growth of ratings and reviews across the web. Ratings and reviews are an excellent way to build a sense of community on a website, to improve customer service and increase loyalty. They have also proven to be a great way for retailers to increase sales. A key part of their growth stems from the escalating importance of Word-of-Mouth (WOM):

  • Trust in a ‘person like me’ tripled to 68% in 2008 v’s 2004 (Edelman, 2008)
  • 84% of consumers now trust user reviews more than critics’ reviews (MarketingSherpa, 2007)

Furthermore, their presence has driven a significant change in behaviour ‘ Most of us are now using online ratings and reviews before making purchasing decisions:

  • ’76% use online reviews to help make purchase decisions’ (Forrester Research, 2007).
  • 78% say consumer recommendations are the most credible form of advertising (Nielsen, 2007),

What retailers have come to realise is that their customers trust each other more than they trust the brand. So providing that your products aren’t junk, it’s far better to let consumers advocate your products to one another than to attempt to persuade them by shoving marketing messages down their throats. The result? Retailers have been adding ratings and reviews to their websites. and they have:

  • helped customers make better decisions
  • increased sales
  • reduced the number of returns because consumers were able to make a better buying decision


Concerns about negative ratings and reviews
Despite all the evidence, we at FreshNetworks still run into uncertainty when discussing ratings and reviews with online retailers. Especially amoung UK-based retailers, there first reaction is often nervousness.

‘Surely people only write a review when they’re really annoyed about something. So if we allow reviews we’ll end up with loads of nasty comments”

It’s an understandable concern, however it’s baseless. When it comes to online reviews for products consumers are far more generous than you might think. Assuming ratings are on a scale from 1 to 5, we’d expect 2.5 to be the average score for reviews. With this in mind, it’s rather impressive that the average score accross the web is actually more like 4.3 (BazaarVoice, 2008).

Even if you do get negative reviews, there is strong evidence that negative reviews are good for retailers ‘ preventing returns and giving more credibility to websites. Woot is a great example of this.
So how to ratings and reviews lie?
There are four key ways in which ratings and reviews lie. There may be more but these are the ones that jump out at me. 1. There is no ‘zero’ score.
Ask most people ‘When is a product good or bad’? and they’ll say above 2.5 is good and below 2.5 is bad. The assumption is that 2.5 is the mean average score that can be awarded. However that’s simply not the case. The vast majority of five-point scales force you to allocate 1,2,3,4,or 5 stars. If you thought a product or service was rubbish, you cannot give it zero; that does not count as a rating. As a result the mean score that can be awarded is 3 not 2.5. This is great for retailers who have ratings and reviews on their site as most items will appear to be better than average even when they are not. 2. Self-selection bias in ratings and reviews
there are three kinds of purchase bias that add to ‘the lie’. The first is self-selection bias. Ask me to rate the restaurant behind my office and I won’t. I’ve never eaten there because I don’t like the way it looks. As a result I have selected myself out of being able to review its food or service. Thus, ratings and reviews’ second lie comes from the self-selection bias inherent in the need for people to have experienced a product or service before rating it. I know that restaurants which sell all you can eat buffets for ??3.50 serve poor quality meat, so I’m not going to buy and I’m not going to review. The people who do review are those who for a given product or service had a reasonable expectation that it would fulfill their needs when making the purchase. Hence the group of potential reviewers is biased from the outset. 3. Choice-supportive bias
The second type of purchase bias comes post-purchase. Choice-supportive bias describes our tendency to recall positive feelings or memories to the choice we made. We tend to remember the positive things about the options we chose more than we remember the positive attributes of the alternatives we did not select. 4. Post-purchase rationalization
The third and final purchase bias is post-purchase rationalisation. This bias comes from our tendency to retrospectively justify our decisions as rational ones. We humans prefer to feel that we made good selections not poor ones. So if you ask me whether or not I liked a product that I just spent my hard earned money on, you’re going to get a positive review more frequently than you get a negative one ‘ we like to feel our past choices have been rational and well made.
It is the sum of these biases that results in an average five-star review of 4.3. That’s a long distance from 2.5.

Despite the lies, Ratings and Reviews are great

I’ve had a bit of a go at Ratings and Reviews, but that does not stop me from liking them. They are excellent tools for online retailers and they do a great service to customers. Just like a review on the back-cover of a book or a politician’s statistics, we should always treat claims with care. And so long as that’s done everyone still stands to benefit. For one thing, if ratings and reviews are considered on a relative basis (as is often the case) then the absolute number does not matter in the least. And let’s be honest, right now, anything that encourages people to buy more is a good thing for the economy and for all of us. What do you think?Post by: Charlie Osmond, Founder and CEO of FreshNetworksFrom the FreshNetworks Blog Subscribe to updates from the FreshNetworks Blog

Speaker Profile: Chris Brogan

With the Community 2.0 event coming up in May, we’re going to introduce you to another keynote speakers for this year’s event. Community 2.0 is May 11-13 in San Fransisco, California at The Palace Hotel. Today, we’re featuring keynote speaker Chris Brogan, the co-founder of PodCamp and President of New Marketing Labs.

Chris Brogan has been working in the world of web 2.0 for more than 10 years. He’s worked with social media using both web and mobile. Find Chris thought the web with these profiles:

Brogan’s Twitter
Brogan’s Facebook
Brogan’s LinkedIn
Brogan’s Blog
Podcast with UltraCreatives
Podcast with Duct Tape Marketing

Join us in San Fransisco on Wednesday, May13th for Chris Brogan’s keynote speech, Bringing Our Own Dial Tone.

Don’t forget, if you’re in the New York City area, we’re kicking off Community 2.0 festivities early with a networking event April 16. Click here for more information and to RSVP.

Waiting on hold

Any customer knows what it’s like to call a company just to be routed through directory after directory. VoIP-News recently published a list of ways to get around waiting for a customer service representative.

So what are the right characters to push:

  1. Press zero. Pressing zero will often result in a direct route to a live person. Continue pressing zero until you’re put through. You may need to try combinations such as “0#,” “#0,” “0*” or “*0.”
  2. Memorize prompts. If you’re unfortunate enough to have call about the same issue on a regular basis, memorize the prompts that work for you.
  3. Press the pound key. Skip to the next message or just confuse the system by pressing this character.
  4. Press the star key. Again, the star key can open up system tricks or simply make the system give up on you.
  5. Press everything. By pressing multiple numbers, you can trick systems into thinking you’re on a rotary phone ‘ or that you’re crazy. Either way, you’re in.
  6. Go through the phone prompts. Sometimes it pays to work with the system.
  7. Press any digit repeatedly. You may land in the wrong department, but you’ll end up at beginning of line when you’re transferred.

For the complete list, read the article here.

Twittering Your Customer Service Woes

According to NYTimes.com, Salesforce.com, the Web-based customer relationship management service that says it has more than a million subscribers, has legitimized the tweet as a cry for help by incorporating Twitter into its system. Now, when customers gripe on Twitter, Salesforce can automatically log a support request, and then post a human response back onto Twitter. Zappos, and Comcast are just a few of the companies using Twitter for customer service. Do you think more companies will follow suit? We’d like to hear your thoughts.

Community 2.0 LinkedIn Monthly Newsletter

Each month, we reach out to our LinkedIn group, providing news, information and discounts related to our community. If you’re not a part of this group click here to join today!
Click on the link below for this month’s edition of the Community 2.0 Newsletter. Don’t forget to update your group settings to receive announcements, get the latest discussions and news pertaining to our group.

http://www.iirusa.com/upload/wysiwyg/New%20Media/C20March2009c123.html

We would also like to invite anyone in the New York City area to our first Community 2.0 Meetup. It will be taking place April 16, from 5:00 to 7:00. For more information and to RSVP, please follow this link:

http://c20eastcoast-C20.eventbrite.com